Generally 
                speaking, corporations in Greece and other European countries 
                that strive to be good 
                corporate citizens do so under the flag of corporate social 
                responsibility (CSR). In the US, however, the CSR flag 
                and slogan are seldom used. In the US, a corporation's goodness 
                usually assumes one of the following three forms: corporate 
                philanthropy as cash and in-kind donations; the corporate 
                citizen serving all stakeholders; or individual 
                corporate executive philanthropy  which constitutes donations 
                to charitable and social programs. Understanding these varied 
                approaches to social responsibility and giving can assist corporations 
                and businesses today as they strive to improve their products 
                or services and succeed in global markets. Moral capitalism is 
                one of their ultimate goals. 
              A 
                brief summary of each of the four approaches to CSR is outlined 
                below: 
              European 
                Corporate Social Responsibility 
              
              In 
                Greece and other EU countries, corporations have adopted the slogan 
                “Corporate Social Responsibility” as a designation for being a 
                socially responsible business with emphasis on the environment, 
                support of their employees, community involvement and social 
                justice . CSR businesses in Europe link this corporate flag 
                to their reputation and to customer and employee loyalty, but 
                especially to brand image and social justice . 
                
              Corporate 
                Philanthropy 
               US 
                corporations selectively target the charities or social programs 
                that they can best support and serve by contributing huge amounts 
                of tax-deductible cash donations. Annual gifting with 
                this approach surpasses US$1 billion worldwide, with enormous 
                donations from such philanthropic heavyweights as Ford Motor, 
                Wal-Mart, Johnson & Johnson, Exxon Mobil, Pfizer, and Citigroup. 
                
              The 
                Corporate Citizen 
              Another 
                strategy that U.S. companies utilize is to wave the flag of good 
                “corporate citizenship.” The good corporate citizen is more than 
                a mere producer of profits for shareholders: this entity serves 
                a variety of stakeholders . KLD Research & Analytics 
                in Boston calculates scores annually for the largest publicly-traded 
                companies by rating each one in the areas of community relations, 
                the environment, employee relations, diversity and cultural relations, 
                and social justice. A few of the top 10 on the 2000-2004 Best 
                Corporate Citizen List are Proctor and Gamble, Intel Corp., 
                Hewlett Packard, IBM, and Starbucks. 
              Individual 
                Corporate Executive Philanthropy 
              In 
                the U.S., the top 50 philanthropic corporate executives in recent 
                years have donated a dizzying US$65 billion tax-deductible dollars 
                to charitable and social programs worldwide. Many of the contributions 
                address inequities that increasingly threaten domestic society, 
                global stability, and world peace. Among the top 50 of these generous 
                executives are Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Michael Bloomberg, Ted 
                Turner, Oprah Winfrey, and Michael Dell. Their assistance targets 
                worthy causes such as health and educational issues, encouraging 
                open and free societies, reproductive choices, the environment, 
                global security, and medical research. 
              Of 
                the four approaches outlined above, the US methods share some 
                characteristics that are not readily apparent. They stand in contrast 
                to the European CSR method, since brand image and social justice 
                in the EU are not generally tied to company performance. In the 
                US, the performance of a company is as important as obligatory 
                philanthropy. Among these three major U.S. approaches to giving, 
                however, are contrasting strategies and techniques whose selection 
                is determined by cultural philosophies on giving, tax codes and 
                regulations, the particular product or service of the individual 
                companies, marketing schemes and brand image, and degree of economic 
                freedom.