| 
           AHI Letter Congratulates The Wall
Street Journal and Senior Editorial Page Writer Robert L.
Pollock 
  
          
          WASHINGTON, DC—On February 22, 2005, AHI President Gene Rossides 
          sent a letter to the editor of  The Wall Street Journal congratulating 
          the Journal and senior editorial writer  Robert L. Pollock for 
          his piece titled, "The Sick Man of Europe--Again" (February 16, 2005; 
          Page A14; col. 3). The text of the letter appears below, followed by 
           The Wall Street Journal article to which the letter responds.  
February 22, 2005 
Letters to the Editor  
The Wall Street Journal  
200 Liberty Street  
New York, NY 10281   
Dear Editor: 
        Congratulations to The
Wall Street Journal and Robert L. Pollock for his revealing article
on Turkey "The Sick Man of Europe-Again" (2-16-05) which tells it as it
is. Finally a mainstream journalist, and a conservative one at that,
has given us the real picture of Turkey's virulent anti-American and
anti-Semitic attitudes. 
        The U.S. media has failed to
cover adequately the situation in Turkey for decades. They have taken
handouts and statements from U.S. officials without serious questioning
or investigation. Mr. Pollock's detailed article will hopefully change
the media's complacency and work habits. Hopefully Mr. Pollock's
article will also stimulate the administration to reassess its policy
towards Turkey. 
                I look forward to a future 
          article by Mr. Pollock detailing Turkey's many instances of cooperation 
          with the Soviet military during the Cold War to the serious detriment 
          of U.S. interests, its violations of U.S. laws and the UN Charter in 
          its invasion of Cyprus and its horrendous human rights violations. 
		  Sincerely,Gene Rossides President, American Hellenic Institute  
        THE WALL STREET 
          JOURNAL
          ANKARA 
          DISPATCH
          The Sick Man of Europe--Again
          Islamism and leftism 
          add up to anti-American madness in Turkey.  
          BY 
            ROBERT L. POLLOCK 
            Wednesday, 
            February 16, 2005 12:01 a.m. 
          ANKARA, Turkey--Several years ago I attended an exhibition 
            in Istanbul. The theme was local art from the era of the country's 
            last military coup (1980). But the artists seemed a lot more concerned 
            with the injustices of global capitalism than the fate of Turkish 
            democracy. In fact, to call the works leftist caricatures--many featured 
            fat capitalists with Uncle Sam hats and emaciated workers--would have 
            been an understatement. As one astute local reviewer put it (I quote 
            from memory): "This shows that Turkish artists were willing to 
            abase themselves voluntarily in ways that Soviet artists refused even 
            at the height of Stalin's oppression." 
            That exhibition came to mind amid all the recent gnashing of teeth 
            in the U.S. over the question of "Who lost Turkey?" Because 
            it shows that a 50-year special relationship, between longtime NATO 
            allies who fought Soviet expansionism together starting in Korea, 
            has long had to weather the ideological hostility and intellectual 
            decadence of much of Istanbul's elite. And at the 2002 election, the 
            increasingly corrupt mainstream parties that had championed Turkish-American 
            ties self-destructed, leaving a vacuum that was filled by the subtle 
            yet insidious Islamism of the Justice and Development (AK) Party. 
            It's this combination of old leftism and new Islamism--much more than 
            any mutual pique over Turkey's refusal to side with us in the Iraq 
            war--that explains the collapse in relations. 
            And what a collapse it has been. On a brief visit to Ankara earlier 
            this month with Undersecretary of Defense Doug Feith, I found a poisonous 
            atmosphere--one in which just about every politician and media outlet 
            (secular and religious) preaches an extreme combination of America- 
            and Jew-hatred that (like the Turkish artists) voluntarily goes far 
            further than anything found in most of the Arab world's state-controlled 
            press. If I hesitate to call it Nazi-like, that's only because Goebbels 
            would probably have rejected much of it as too crude. 
            Consider the Islamist newspaper Yeni Safak, Prime Minister Recep Tayyip 
            Erdogan's favorite. A Jan. 9 story claimed that U.S. forces were tossing 
            so many Iraqi bodies into the Euphrates that mullahs there had issued 
            a fatwa prohibiting residents from eating its fish. Yeni Safak has 
            also repeatedly claimed that U.S. forces used chemical weapons in 
            Fallujah. One of its columnists has alleged that U.S. soldiers raped 
            women and children there and left their bodies in the streets to be 
            eaten by dogs. Among the paper's "scoops" have been the 
            1,000 Israeli soldiers deployed alongside U.S. forces in Iraq, and 
            that U.S. forces have been harvesting the innards of dead Iraqis for 
            sale on the U.S. "organ market." 
            It's not much better in the secular press. The mainstream Hurriyet 
            has accused Israeli hit squads of assassinating Turkish security personnel 
            in Mosul, and the U.S. of starting an occupation of Indonesia under 
            the guise of humanitarian assistance. At Sabah, a columnist last fall 
            accused the U.S. ambassador to Turkey, Eric Edelman, of letting his 
            "ethnic origins"--guess what, he's Jewish--determine his 
            behavior. Mr. Edelman is indeed the all-too-rare foreign-service officer 
            who takes seriously his obligation to defend America's image and interests 
            abroad. The intellectual climate in which he's operating has gone 
            so mad that he actually felt compelled to organize a conference call 
            with scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey to explain that secret 
            U.S. nuclear testing did not cause the recent tsunami. 
            Never in an ostensibly friendly country have I had the impression 
            of embassy staff so besieged. Mr. Erdogan's office recently forbade 
            Turkish officials from attending a reception at the ambassador's residence 
            in honor of the "Ecumenical" Patriarch of the Orthodox Church, 
            who resides in Istanbul. Why? Because "ecumenical" means 
            universal, which somehow makes it all part of a plot to carve up Turkey. 
            Perhaps the most bizarre anti-American story au courant in the Turkish 
            capital is the "eighth planet" theory, which holds not only 
            that the U.S. knows of an impending asteroid strike, but that we know 
            it's going to hit North America. Hence our desire to colonize the 
            Middle East. 
            It all sounds loony, I know. But such stories are told in all seriousness 
            at the most powerful dinner tables in Ankara. The common thread is 
            that almost everything the U.S. is doing in the world--even tsunami 
            relief--has malevolent motivations, usually with the implication that 
            we're acting as muscle for the Jews. 
            In the face of such slanders Turkish politicians have been utterly 
            silent. In fact, Turkish parliamentarians themselves have accused 
            the U.S. of "genocide" in Iraq, while Mr. Erdogan (who we 
            once hoped would set for the Muslim world an example of democracy) 
            was among the few world leaders to question the legitimacy of the 
            Iraqi elections. When confronted, Turkish pols claim they can't risk 
            going against "public opinion." 
            All of which makes Mr. Erdogan a prize hypocrite for protesting to 
            Condoleezza Rice the unflattering portrayal of Turkey in an episode 
            of the fictional TV show "The West Wing." The episode allegedly 
            depicts Turkey as having been taking over by a retrograde populist 
            government that threatens women's rights. (Sounds about right to me.) 
            In the old days, Turkey would have had an opposition party strong 
            enough to bring such a government closer to sanity. But the only opposition 
            now is a moribund People's Republican Party, or CHP, once the party 
            of Ataturk. At a recent party congress, its leader accused his main 
            challenger of having been part of a CIA plot against him. That's not 
            to say there aren't a few comparatively pro-U.S. officials left in 
            the current government and the state bureaucracies. But they're afraid 
            to say anything in public. In private, they whine endlessly about 
            trivial things the U.S. "could have done differently." 
            Entirely forgotten is that President Bush was among the first world 
            leaders to recognize Prime Minister Erdogan, while Turkey's own legal 
            system was still weighing whether he was secular enough for the job. 
            Forgotten have been decades of U.S. military assistance. Forgotten 
            have been years of American efforts to secure a pipeline route for 
            Caspian oil that terminates at the Turkish port of Ceyhan. Forgotten 
            has been the fact that U.S. administrations continue to fight annual 
            attempts in Congress to pass a resolution condemning modern Turkey 
            for the long-ago Armenian genocide. Forgotten has been America's persistent 
            lobbying for Turkish membership in the European Union. 
            Forgotten, above all, has been America's help against the PKK. Its 
            now-imprisoned leader, Abdullah Ocalan, was expelled from Syria in 
            1998 after the Turks threatened military action. He was then passed 
            like a hot potato between European governments, who refused to extradite 
            him to Turkey because--gasp!--he might face the death penalty. He 
            was eventually caught--with the help of U.S. intelligence--sheltered 
            in the Greek Embassy in Nairobi. "They gave us Ocalan. What could 
            be bigger than that?" says one of a handful of unapologetically 
            pro-U.S. Turks I still know. 
            I know that Mr. Feith (another Jew, the Turkish press didn't hesitate 
            to note), and Ms. Rice after him, pressed Turkish leaders on the need 
            to challenge some of the more dangerous rhetoric if they value the 
            Turkey-U.S. relationship. There is no evidence yet that they got a 
            satisfactory answer. Turkish leaders should understand that the "public 
            opinion" they cite is still reversible. But after a few more 
            years of riding the tiger, who knows? Much of Ataturk's legacy risks 
            being lost, and there won't be any of the old Ottoman grandeur left, 
            either. Turkey could easily become just another second-rate country: 
            small-minded, paranoid, marginal and--how could it be otherwise?--friendless 
            in America and unwelcome in Europe. 
            Mr. Pollock is a senior editorial page writer at the Journal. 
          ### 
           For additional information, please contact Georgia 
            Economou at (202)785-8430 or at georgia@ahiworld.org. For general 
            information about the activities of AHI, please see our website at 
            http://www.ahiworld.org 
         
          
         
           
           
            
            
           
             |